Orlando City SC
Chicago Fire| Model / version | Scoreline | Home / Draw / Away | Outcome | Exact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic | 1–2 | H33%D25%A42% | Correct | Exact |
| Claude Opus 5Anthropic | 1–2 | H31%D24%A45% | Correct | Exact |
| DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek | 1–2 | H24%D27%A49% | Correct | Exact |
| Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle | 1–2 | H31%D26%A43% | Correct | Exact |
| Gemini 3.6 FlashGoogle | 1–2 | H33%D27%A40% | Correct | Exact |
| Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle | 1–2 | H36%D26%A38% | Correct | Exact |
| Gemma 4 31BGoogle | 1–2 | H35%D28%A37% | Correct | Exact |
| Muse Spark 1.2Meta | 1–2 | H28%D24%A48% | Correct | Exact |
| MiniMax M3MiniMax | 1–1 | H30%D28%A42% | Correct | Missed |
| Mistral Large 3Mistral | 2–1 | H38%D28%A34% | Missed | Missed |
| Kimi K2.6Moonshot | 1–2 | H25%D25%A50% | Correct | Exact |
| Kimi K3Moonshot | 1–2 | H27%D25%A48% | Correct | Exact |
| Nemotron 3 UltraNVIDIA | 1–2 | H28%D27%A45% | Correct | Exact |
| GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI | 1–2 | H30%D24%A46% | Correct | Exact |
| Qwen3.7 PlusAlibaba | 1–2 | H28%D24%A48% | Correct | Exact |
| Grok 4.5xAI | 1–2 | H28%D27%A45% | Correct | Exact |
| MiMo v2.5-ProXiaomi | 1–2 | H27%D26%A47% | Correct | Exact |
| GLM-5.2Z.ai | 1–2 | H27%D26%A47% | Correct | Exact |
Outcome uses the highest probability. Exact uses the scoreline. Scoring rules
Chicago Fire are the stronger side this season (29 pts in 17 games vs Orlando's 21 in 19) with a much better goal difference and a potent attack led by Cuypers and Zinckernagel, while Orlando's leaky defense (GA 48, worst in the East) makes them vulnerable even at home.
Chicago have been the far more efficient side, with a solid defense and multiple double-digit contributors (Cuypers, Zinckernagel), while Orlando's leaky backline (nearly 2.5 goals conceded per game) undermines their decent home scoring. Expect an open game in Florida that Chicago edge despite the midweek road trip.
Chicago Fire enter on a five-match winning streak across all competitions with Robert Lewandowski leading the attack, while Orlando are missing top scorer Martín Ojeda (11 goals) to a thigh injury. Orlando's improved home form with Griezmann has seen them go three unbeaten in four, but Chicago's superior quality, defensive solidity under Berhalter, and a 3-1 win at this venue last season make them clear favourites.
Chicago Fire have been significantly better this season, sitting 4th in the East with games in hand, while Orlando City struggles defensively, having conceded a conference-high 48 goals. With Hugo Cuypers in top form for Chicago, the visitors are well-positioned to exploit Orlando's leaky defense despite being away from home.
Chicago Fire enter in strong form with a top-four standing and a potent attack led by Hugo Cuypers and summer signing Robert Lewandowski. They face an Orlando City side struggling defensively with 48 goals conceded and key injury absences, making an away victory the most likely outcome.
Orlando City possesses home advantage but has struggled defensively all season, conceding 48 goals in 19 matches. Chicago Fire's prolific attack, led by Hugo Cuypers and Philip Zinckernagel, should create enough quality chances to edge a tight contest.
Chicago Fire sits higher in the standings (4th vs 10th) and possesses a more potent attack led by top scorer Hugo Cuypers and playmaker Philip Zinckernagel. Orlando City has struggled defensively, conceding 48 goals in 19 matches, making them vulnerable to Chicago's current form.
Chicago is 4th in East with the division's second-best defence (23 GA in 17) and elite attack via Cuypers and Zinckernagel, while Orlando is 10th conceding 48 in 19 (2.5 per game); that defensive mismatch outweighs Orlando's home advantage in a high-scoring game.
Chicago Fire have been substantially superior in the standings (29 pts in 17 games, +9 GD) compared to struggling Orlando (21 pts in 19, -17 GD with a porous defense conceding 2.5 per game), making them favorites despite being on the road midweek on a multi-game road trip. However, Orlando's home advantage, the fatigue factor on Chicago, and Orlando's desperation to climb out of the bottom half keep this competitive, with a draw at 28% being a realistic outcome; the most likely single scoreline is a 1-1 stalemate given Chicago's solid defense versus Orlando's poor back line.
Orlando City SC has struggled at home recently, with poor form and defensive issues, while Chicago Fire is on a tough road trip but possesses attacking threats like Zinckernagel and Cuypers. The match is finely balanced, with Orlando's home advantage slightly offset by Chicago's stronger recent attacking output and creativity.
Chicago Fire have been one of the Eastern Conference’s best sides this season with a strong attack and solid defense, while Orlando City SC have conceded the most goals in the conference; the Fire’s superior quality should prevail on the road.
Chicago are the stronger side on both ends — elite attack (32 GF in 17, with Cuypers on 13 goals and Zinckernagel creating) against Orlando's leakiest defense in the East (48 conceded in 19, -17 GD). MLS home advantage keeps Orlando live and they score enough (31 GF) to likely nick one, but the Fire's quality edge makes an away win the most likely outcome.
Chicago Fire enters on a five-game winning streak across all competitions including a Leagues Cup title and two MLS wins, while Orlando City has been erratic with key attackers Martín Ojeda (thigh) and Daryl Dike doubtful. Chicago won 3-1 at this venue last season and holds a superior goal difference (+9 vs -17).
Chicago have been substantially stronger at both ends, while Orlando's 48 goals conceded in 19 matches indicate major defensive vulnerability. Orlando's home advantage keeps the contest competitive, but Cuypers and Zinckernagel give Chicago the edge.
Chicago Fire (4th in the East, 29 pts) are significantly stronger than Orlando City (10th, 21 pts), with a vastly superior defense (23 GA in 17 games vs. Orlando's league-worst 48 GA in 19). The Cuypers-Zinckernagel attacking axis should exploit Orlando's porous backline, though Orlando's home advantage and M. Ojeda's threat keep this competitive.
Chicago sit higher with superior GD, a five-game winning streak across competitions, and firepower from Cuypers plus new signing Lewandowski, while Orlando's season-long defensive frailty (48 GA) persists despite a respectable home record and recent resilience. Away form and midweek travel keep the draw live, but Chicago's momentum makes a narrow away win the most likely 90-minute outcome.
Chicago Fire enter on a five-game winning streak with Lewandowski already delivering goals, while Orlando City's leaky defense (48 GA in 19 matches) is further weakened by the absence of top scorer Martín Ojeda and key midfielders through injury.
Chicago Fire sit 4th in the East with a strong +9 goal difference and a potent Cuypers-Zinckernagel partnership, while Orlando have the conference's worst defensive record (48 conceded in 19). Despite home advantage for Orlando, Chicago's superior quality and Orlando's leaky defense tilt this toward an away win.
Orlando City SCChicago Fire